|
Avoid
padding in your essay
|
|
Make
your writing style much stronger by making every word count. Every
word in your sentence, paragraph and document must earn its place.
When you edit your document, assume you can delete around 20 percent
of the words. Heres an example, where the original 84-word
paragraph becomes 40 per cent shorter by cutting out wasted words.
|
Original
|
|
|
|
Redraft
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some
people are predicting, because of the length of Internet
calls and the amount of bandwidth the calls take, that one
day in the not so distant future, the entire telephone network,
or at least a great portion of it, will cease to function,
and all telephone calls will fail to connect. This idea
is referred to by some as the Gridlock Theory.
Others advise that steps can be taken to avoid such a disaster,
such as upgrading telephone lines and limiting Internet
use.
(84
words)
|
|
|
|
Many
predict gridlock on the Internet as telephone networks collapse
under the weight of higher traffic outstripping available
bandwidth. Others believe measures such as upgrading telephone
lines and limiting Internet use can avoid the disaster Gridlock
Theory suggests.
(48
words)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two
key writing techniques can help you cut out padding.
1.
Write most of your sentences in the Who-Does-What
order.
Using
the Who-Does-What order means starting the sentence with
the main subject, followed by a strong active verb. For example:
|
|
 |
|
|
Padded
|
This
idea is referred to by scientists as the Gridlock Theory.
(11 words)
|
|
 |
|
|
The
Who-Does-What order places scientists first, followed by
the verb refer. This shortens the sentence to:
|
|
 |
|
| Concise |
Scientists
refer to this as Gridlock Theory. (7 words)
(Who-Does-What)
|
|
 |
|
|
The
Who-Does-What order will cut out wasted words and encourage
you to write your sentences with active verbs.
2.
Write with specific nouns and action verbs close together.
This
technique takes the idea of Who-Does-What rule one step
further. You may have noticed the Who-Does-What technique
encourages you to start your sentence with the main noun and follow
it with the most important verb.
Nouns
(the scientist, oxygen) are the content and verbs (proved,
leaked) the actions in your writing. Adjectives add to or
describe the content (the difficult experiment) and adverbs
qualify the actions (the thoroughly reworked experiment).
The other parts of the sentence glue together the nouns, verbs,
adjectives and adverbs. Lets take a simple example:
|
|
 |
|
| Example: |
Lawson
quickly criticized
Lovell because of his unscientific
investigation into the pollution
in the river.
|
|
 |
|
|
Nouns:
|
Lawson,
Lovell, investigation, pollution, river
|
|
 |
|
|
Verb:
|
criticized
|
|
 |
|
|
Adverbs:
|
quickly
|
|
 |
|
|
Adjectives:
|
unscientific
|
|
 |
|
|
Glue:
|
because
of his, into the, in the
|
|
 |
|
|
The
key words for meaning are the nouns and the verb. We can write:
Lawson criticized Lovells investigation [of] river
pollution. The meaning is in the nouns (content) and verbs
(action). Although you need adverbs and adjectives for more description
we turned the noun river into an adjective (river
pollution), they are not essential. The words of least meaning
are the glue words those present to hold the other parts
of speech together in a coherent sentence.
To
write a strong style you must keep use specific nouns and action
verbs close together. This means cutting the glue words and questioning
whether you need the qualifying adjectives and adverbs. If you
need adverbs or adjectives, you must place them next to the words
they qualify. This changes our original 15-word sentence to eight
words.
|
|
 |
|
| Original |
Lawson
quickly criticized
Lovell because of his unscientific
investigation into the pollution
in the river.
|
|
 |
|
| Redraft |
Lawson
criticized Lovells
unscientific investigation
of river pollution.
|
|
 |
|
|
The
quickest way to learn this technique is to cut the glue words
cementing your nouns and verbs together and placing any necessary
adjectives and adverbs close to the words they qualify. Look how
many words we can cut from this sentence:
|
|
 |
|
| Original |
What
I propose to do,
therefore, is to identify the equivalent
conditions in the two
experiments and then go
on to explain the reasons
for the importance of these conditions.
(30 words)
|
|
 |
|
| Redraft |
I
propose to identify
the equivalent conditions
in both experiments
and explain their importance.
(14 words)
|
|
 |
|
|
The
redraft packs the nouns and verbs
together and cuts out redundant words.
|
|