|
CONTENTS
|
|
Link
your essay ideas and paragraphs
|
|
Make
sure that each sentence flows logically. The traditional way to
do this when writing an essay is to use connecting words or phrases,
often conjunctions (linking words) such as although,
because, so, moreover, or
therefore. In this way, you build your logic and arguments.
These connections come in simple and complex forms.
Simple
connections
also,
although, and, as, because, but, despite, first, however, if,
next, now, second, then, therefore, third, until
Although
we sometimes need words to show the logic and connection between
sentences and paragraphs, many connecting words make your style
more complex and academic than necessary. For example:
Complex
connections
accordingly,
as you are aware, consequently, for this reason, furthermore,
hence, in addition, inasmuch as, likewise, more specifically,
moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless
Heres
a comprehensive list of connections. Try to limit yourself to
the simple connections shown in blue. Try to avoid those shown
in red as they detract from a clear, concise style.
|
|
 |
|
|
Type
|
|
Simple
Recommended
|
|
Complex
Not recommended
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Addition
|
again,
and, besides, finally, first, next, second, then, third
|
further,
furthermore, in addition, in addition to, lastly, moreover
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Comparison
|
after
all, against, although, but, by comparison, compared to, however,
in contrast, meanwhile, where, yet
|
although
this may be true, balanced against this, conversely, in the meantime,
nevertheless, nonetheless, on the contrary, on the other hand,
vis-à-vis, whereas
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
therefore,
in conclusion, in summary, to conclude, to summarize
|
accordingly,
as a result, as has been shown, consequently, thus
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Emphasis
|
always,
forever, naturally, never
|
absolutely,
certainly, definitely, emphatically, extremely, in fact, indeed,
obviously, positively, undeniably
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Example
|
for
example, for instance, such as, that is
|
e.g.,
i.e., in this case, in this situation, on this occasion
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Exception
|
despite,
however, sometimes, still, yet
|
in
spite of, nevertheless, of course, once in a while
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Proof
|
because,
besides, if
|
evidently,
for the same reason, furthermore, in fact, indeed, moreover, obviously
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Sequence
|
after,
afterward, afterwards, before, finally, first, following, later,
next, now, previously, soon, then, therefore
|
and
so forth, at this point, at this time, concurrently, consequently,
hence, subsequently, thus
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Time
|
after,
afterward, afterwards, and then, finally, first, formerly, immediately,
later, next, previously, second, soon, then,
|
firstly,
secondly, thereafter, thirdly
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Look
at this example with too many complex connecting words or phrases.
Dont you think the style looks false and unnatural?
|
Original
|
|
|
|
Redraft
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Although
this may be true,
Krammer argues growth in the economy depends mainly on higher
government spending. Accordingly,
he argues that direct investment, whatever its source leads
to growth. Indeed, Krammer
states that the circulation of money in the economy is the
key consideration when forecasting growth, that
is to say, how the government controls interest rates,
government debt. This is despite the
fact that most economists believe the picture is
more complex. Consequently,
James and Proctor, in Issue 95 of New Economics,
dismiss Krammer’s views as failing to look at all
traditional growth theory,and thus
failing to explain historical growth when government spending
was low or negative.
|
|
|
|
But,
Krammer argues growth in the economy depends mainly on higher
government spending. He argues that direct investment, whatever
its source leads to growth. Krammer states that the circulation
of money in the economy is the key consideration when forecasting
growth how the government controls interest rates
and government debt. Most economists believe the picture
is more complex. James and Proctor, in Issue 95 of New
Economics, dismiss Krammers views as failing
to look at all traditional growth theory, and therefore
failing to explain historical growth when government spending
was low or negative.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use
the connections to make sure your reader can follow the flow of
information, ideas and arguments within sentences, from sentence
to sentence and between paragraphs. But dont let too many
connections creep into your writing and keep to the simple ones
recommended.
|
|
|